__Estimating Transmitter Distance__

The general equation for estimating transmitter field strength is calculated from the equation below:

Where d is distance in meters, E is the field strength in V/m and Pt is the total power from the transmitter. By finding your radio receivers field strength,(usually in the manual) then the equation can be transposed to solve distance:

The next step is to work out the power from the transmitter. The 2 stage circuit above works from a 9 volt battery, its output frequency was measured to be 107.2MHz. The final common emitter stage of this circuit, develops power in the tank circuit, which is transferred to the antenna, in this case a 30cm telescopic whip. Most of the power is developed in the coil, there are three ways to calculate this:

At resonance the voltage and current in the oscillator tank circuit will be in phase. Therefore all that is needed is to find the impedance of the tank circuit and either the voltage across it or the current flowing through it. The problem in measuring the ac voltage across the tank circuit is that most meters will not give accurate results at high frequencies. This is the same for high frequency currents. To estimate the ac collector current in the tank circuit, I have worked out the dc collector current. The two values will be slightly different, but as this is only an approximation, the error will not be significant. To find the dc collector current, measure the dc voltage across the emitter resistor and use ohm's law. In my circuit, this measured 2.99V across the 470 ohm emitter resistor, the dc collector current is therefore :

2.99 / 470 = 6.362mA

This value will be substituted for the ac collector current. The impedance of the tank circuit at resonance is given by the following equation:

The R is the dc resistance of the coil in the tank circuit. At VHF, this is small as coils have only a few turns. In this circuit the dc resistance was measured at 0.1 ohm.

__Small signal Analysis:__

The equivalent output circuit for the transmitter is now worked out and drawn as below. The impedance of the tank circuit (100K) is in parallel with the output impedance of the transistor. This value, around 40k can generally be ignored, but in this case it is in parallel with the output circuit and makes an appreciable difference. Also the 3.3pf capacitor is in series with the 470 ohm resistor. This is also considered at short circuit as the power supply is decoupled with a capacitor. The capacitive reactance of the 22nF capacitor is a short circuit. The effective load or impedance of the output will be as below:

The overall output circuit is the parallel combination of these components. The 3.3p capacitor has an impedance of around 450 ohms at 107.2 MHz. The combined impedance is therefore:-

40k // 100k // (450+470) = 891.3 ohms

Having now found the impedance, the approximate power in the tank circuit can be calculated:-

Having now found a value for total transmitter power,Pt and using a radio receiver with a known sensitivity of 20uV/meter the distance the signal would be received is worked out:

This equation assumes that all the power in the tank circuit, 36mW is transferred without loss to the antenna and that the antenna has a gain of unity. The result also assumes there are no losses incurred from transmitter to receiver due to probagation effects as well. Using a 30 cm length of telescopic antenna , I have modified the equation to compensate for losses in the antenna and coupling circuit . I have assisgned a variable called A

_{L}into the equation and estimated its value at 1%. The modified equation is then:

The new result calculates effective distance from transmitter to a radio receiver with 20uV/m sensitivity. This is clearly a vast reduction in distance from the first result. To test this result, i went to a large field. Holding the transmitter at roughly 1 meter high from the ground, i walked away carrying the receiver. The signal was clearly audible 300 meters from the transmitter giving a strong reading on the signal strength meter of the receiver. This was about the length of the field. I must stress again that the above calculations are ONLY approximate, but if anyone repeats this experiment, i would like to hear from you.